Judging the Data: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice Standards

Judging the Data: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice Standards

When it comes to assessing the quality of toxicologic data to develop policy decisions, should regulators rely on journal peer review or on Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards? Authors of a review comparing the two conclude that the answer is neither. Instead, they propose that regulators need a well-defined scheme in which the best elements of both processes enable data to be weighed and ...

Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice

BACKGROUND There is an ongoing discussion on the provenance of toxicity testing data regarding how best to ensure its validity and credibility. A central argument is whether journal peer-review procedures are superior to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards employed for compliance with regulatory mandates. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the rationale for regulatory decision making based ...

the impact of peer review on efl reviewers writing proficiency

امروزه تصحیح همکلاسی در کلاسهای نگارش یکی از اجزاء لاینفک کلاسهای دانش آموز محور است. تاثیرات مفید تصحیح همکلاسی بر زبان آموزان، معلمان را متقاعد کرده است که علیرغم صرف زمان، انرژی و توان بسیار، از این شیوه ی آموزشی در کلاسهای آموزش نگارش بهره بگیرند. تحقیق حاضر بر آن است تا با مقایسه دو گروه از یادگیرندگان زبان انگلیسی، تاثیر تصحیح همکلاسی را بر توانایی نوشتاری آنها نشان دهد. 122 خانم زبان آمو...

Technical note:Beyond Good Laboratory Practice

Judging the judges: keeping objectivity in peer review.

As I write this, the 2002 Winter Olympic Games are underway. The events surrounding the judging of the ice skating competitions will forever remind us of the need for objectivity when assessing human performance and of how difficult it can be to be objective. Sometimes objective measurement is easy— there is no question about events like bobsledding. This is not the case, however, when artistic...